Supreme Court of India
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. M/s. Kalvert Foods India Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid position and since there was clandestine removal of excisable goods, the period of limitation 8 in the present case would have to be computed from the date of their knowledge, arrived at upon raids on the premises.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Central Excise Act, 1944: s.11A - Demand of duty and c levy of penalty - Suppression of facts - Extended period of limitation - Invocation of - Allegation that assessee-company clandestinely removed excisable goods by showing them as non-excisable - Held: The statement of Managing Director ·' was on record where he had admitted the fact of clandestine clearance of excisable goods and, therefore, has voluntarily come forward to sort out the issue and to pay the central excise duty liability - The company was also maintaining two sets of computerized commercial invoices, one for excisable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.