Supreme Court of India

Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana

Neutral citation
Bench Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma JJ.
Decided 4 July 2011

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

Thus, appeal is hereby allowed. Judgment and order of conviction as recorded by the trial court and confirmed by learned Single Judge of the High Court qua the appellant are hereby set aside and quashed. The Appellant is acquitted of all the charges.

Judgment, Para 48

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860: ss.376(2)(g) and 366 - Abduction of PW-9 (prosecutrix) from her aunt's house and subsequent gang-rape - Eight accused - Solitary evidence of the prosecutrix - Six accused convicted under s.366 while accused-appellant and another accused convicted under both s.366 and s.376(2)(g) - Conviction of appellant - Justification. - Held: Not justified - The evidence of the prosecutrix did not inspire confidence - She did not mention the name of appellant in the FIR, instead she described him as Gitta (Short statured) with beard, even though she was aware of his name - No explanation was offered by her in this regard.

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.