Supreme Court of India
Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: c ss.376(2)(g) and 366 - Abduction of PW-9 (prosecutrix) from her aunt's house and subsequent gang-rape - Eight accused - Solitary evidence of the prosecutrix - Six accused convicted under s.366 while accused-appellant and another accused convicted under both s.366 and s.376(2J(g) - 0 Conviction of appellant - Justification. - Held: Not justified - The evidence of the prosecutrix did not inspire confidence - She did not mention the name of appellant in the FIR, instead she described him as Gitta (Short statured) with beard, even though she was aware of his name - · No
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Prakash Nishad @ Kewat Zinak Nishad v. State of Maharashtra
- 2022 Chotkau v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2020 Ganesan v. State Represented by its Inspector of Police
- 2016 Dhal Singh Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh
- 2025 Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah & Ors.
- 2023 Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala v. State of Gujarat
- 2022 Manoj & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2020 Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Of those, 4 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.