Supreme Court of India
Sunil Rai @ Paua & Ors. v. Union Territory, Chandigarh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons we find it impossible to rely upon the evidence of PW-10 and, thus, goes the extra judicial oral confession by Sunil Rai.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s. 302134 - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Extra- c judicial confession - Conviction of three accused by trial court - Affirmed by High Court - HELD: The first circumstance of deceased seen being chased by accused not established - The witness who claims that the main accused made confession to him, tried to save· one of the accused and 0 implicate another person in his place and thus, his evidence cannot be relied upon - The recovery of blood stained jacket of the main accused is of no consequence ·as his blood sample was not taken to ascertain his blood group - Theft
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.