Supreme Court of India
State of U. P. v. Mohd.. Iqram & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s.302134 - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Shrieks c of victim heard in the night by police party on general patrolling - Three persons seen scaling down the wall near the room of victim - Two of them (accused) apprehended - Accused led the police and witnesses to the room of victim where she was found lying unconscious - She died in hospital 0 - Accused totally strangers to the area - Medical evidence that death could be caused by strangulation by hands - Conviction by trial court - Acquittal by High Court - HELD: Circumstantial evidence is so strong that it points
Authorities it was built on
- 1984 Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
- 2010 Babu v. State of Kerala
- 2010 Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
- 2010 Brahm Swaroop & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- 1983 State of Bihar v. Radha Krishna Singh & Ors.
- 1992 State of Maharashtra Etc. Etc. v. Sukhdeo Singh and Anr. Etc.. Etc.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.