Supreme Court of India
Dunlop India Limited v. A.P. Rahna and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Kerela Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965: c s.11(4)(v)- Eviction on the ground that tenant ceased to occupy the premises for six months without reasonable cause , - Held: If the premises is let out for business or commercial purpose, complete cessation of the business/commercial activity may give rise to a presumption that the tenant had ceased to occupy the premises - The inittal burden to show that the tenant has ceased to occupy the premises continuously for 6 months is always on the landlord· - Once such evidence is adduced, the burden shifts on the tenant to prove that there
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Mr. Rajendra K. Bhutta v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority through its Chairman & Anr.
- 2013 Aspi Jal & Anr. v. Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor
Of those, 2 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.