Supreme Court of India
Ajit Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We find no reason to interfere with the action taken against the appellant nor we find any infirmity in the impugned judgment and order of the High Court.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
CONSTITUTION OF IND/ , 1950: Articles 310, 311(2)(b) - Sub-Judge - Removal from service invoking provisions of Article 311 (2)(b) - Held: In the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court rightly held that it was not possible to hold an inquiry - Service Law. Article 311 (2)(b) read with Articles 233, 234 to 236 - Sub Judge - Removed from service with the recommendation of High Court withoui holding an inquiry - Held: Subordinate Judge is also a judge within the meaning of provision of Article 233 read with Articles 235 and 236 - High Court is vested with 'the power to take decision
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Hari Niwas Gupta v. State of Bihar and Another
- 2018 The Gauhati High Court through the Registrar General v. Goto Ete & Others
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.