Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Bharat Singh and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that in the writ petitions filed 0 by the aggrieved candidates before the High Court all aspects of the matter shall be open to examination in which everyone connected with the selection process would have an opportunity to place his/her point of view.
Judgment, page 28
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980: Purpose of the Act - Discussed. c Post of Principal in affiliated/aided Degree and Post Graduate institutions - Whether amenable to reservation - Held: The post of principal in aided/affiliated institution being a single post in the cadre is not amenable to any reservation - Interchangeability of the post and transferability of incumbents to another post in the same cadre are essential attributes of a cadre, which is absent in the case of post of Principal - There is no power vested in the State Government or any other authority
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Veerendra Kr. Gautam and Others v. Karuna Nidhan Upadhyay and Others
- 2019 R. R. Inamdar v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.