Supreme Court of India
Sri Indra Das v. State of Assam
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1.987 - s.3(5) - Membership of banned organisation - Conviction of appellant u/s.3(5) - Sustainability - Held: Mere membership of a banned organization cannot incriminate a person unless he is proved to have resorted to acts of violence or incited people to imminent violence, or did an act intended to create disorder or disturbance of public peace by resort to imminent violence - In the present case, even assuming that accused-appellant was a member of ULFA- a banned organization, there was no evidence to show that he did acts of the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (eevfam) & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2013 Union of India v. Namit Sharma
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.