Supreme Court of India
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nishant Sareen
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - s. 19 - Previous sanction necessary for prosecution - Reviewing of order granting or refusing sanction to prosecute public servant on same materials by sanctioning authority - Permissibility of - Held: Not permissible - Power of the sanctioning authority being not of continuing character could be exercised only once on the same materials - On basis of the fresh materials collected by the investigating agency subsequent to the earlier order, sanctioning authority can reconsider the matter and form an opinion to grant sanction to prosecute the public servant
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 State of Punjab v. Labh Singh
- 2018 Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association & Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
- 2016 L. Narayana Swamy v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- 2012 Deepak Khinchi v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.