Supreme Court of India
R.S. Sujatha v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: s. 2(c) - Criminal contempt - Employee filed an OA before Tribunal for quashing the disciplinary proceedings initiated against her - Opposite party raised issue of limitation on the ground that the employee was served charge memo at earlier stage and averment made by her in that regard was false - Tribunal instead of deciding the case on merits or on limitation, held that the appellant was guilty of perjury, as well as of criminal contempt of the Tribunal o - Propriety of the order of Tribunal - Held: The Tribunal ought to have framed an issue on limitation and
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 James Kunjwal v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.
- 2019 Aarish Asgar Qureshi v. Fareed Ahmed Qureshi & Anr.
- 2013 Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Neeraj Kumar & Anr.
- 2013 Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2022 Himanshu Kumar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Of those, 4 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.