Supreme Court of India
M/s Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. v. Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951: s.298 - De-licencing of sugar industry - Press Note 12 dated 31. 8. 1998, followed by a formal Notification on 11. 9. 1998 issued u/s. 298( 1) of the Act, de-licencing the sugar industry, subject to the condition that there would be a minimum of 15 Km. distance between two sugar mills - Validity of - Held: Valid. s.298 - Power under- Held: Is not tainted by the vice of excessive delegation since the essential legislative policy is specified in the preamble of the Act and is writ large throughout the provisions of the Act. s. 298 - Legislative
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India
- 2019 Prashanti Medical Services & Research Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2013 Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India & Others
Of those, 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.