Supreme Court of India

Tukaram S. Dighole v. Manikrao Shivaji Kokate

Neutral citation
Reported as [2010] 2 S.C.R. 396
Bench D.K. Jain and P. Sathasivam JJ.
Decided 5 February 2010

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that in the instant case the appellant has miserably failed to prove the authenticity c 'of the cassette as well as the accuracy of the speeches purportedly made by the respondent.

Judgment, page 18

From the headnote

Election Laws: c . R(]presentation of the People Act, 1951: ss.101(b), 101(d)(ii), 101(d)(iv) and 123(3) - Lok Sabha Elections ..:.:. Corrupt practice - Proof - Election of returned candidate challenged on the ground of communal· appeal· to electorate· - VHS cassette stated to have contained the speeches produced - HELD: charge of corrupt practice envisaged by the Act is equated with a criminal charge and, therefore, standard of proof therefor is proof beyond reasonable doubt as in a criminal case - heavy onus' lies on election petitioner to prove the· charge of corrupt practice in the same

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.