Supreme Court of India
Tukaram S. Dighole v. Manikrao Shivaji Kokate
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that in the instant case the appellant has miserably failed to prove the authenticity c 'of the cassette as well as the accuracy of the speeches purportedly made by the respondent.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
Election Laws: c . R(]presentation of the People Act, 1951: ss.101(b), 101(d)(ii), 101(d)(iv) and 123(3) - Lok Sabha Elections ..:.:. Corrupt practice - Proof - Election of returned candidate challenged on the ground of communal· appeal· to electorate· - VHS cassette stated to have contained the speeches produced - HELD: charge of corrupt practice envisaged by the Act is equated with a criminal charge and, therefore, standard of proof therefor is proof beyond reasonable doubt as in a criminal case - heavy onus' lies on election petitioner to prove the· charge of corrupt practice in the same
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 G H P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep v. State of Kerala and Anr.
- 2020 Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors.
- 2018 Shafhi Mohammad v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2014 Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.