Supreme Court of India
Daya Shankar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law: Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 - r. 5(1) - Termination of service - Selection and appointment of employee as constable - Furnishing of false factual information by employee in the verification roll as regards criminal case registered against him - Termination of service - Upheld by High Court - Held: Justified - Employee was not truthful in giving material information regarding his antecedents which were relevant for employment in a uniformed service - He knowingly made a false statement that he was not prosecuted in any criminal case - It cannot be said
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Bhupendra Yadav
- 2022 State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- 2021 Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and Another v. Anil Kanwariya
- 2016 Avtar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2024 Union of India and Others v. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal
- 2022 Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India & Ors
- 2012 Jainendra Singh v. State of U.P. Tr. Prinl. Sec. Home & Ors.
Of those, 4 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.