Supreme Court of India
Ganpat v. State of Haryana & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the complainant party was the aggressor and in the absence of definite material and explanation from the prosecution side, the High Court is right in acquitting all of them. 8.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 148, 302, 325, 324, 323 rlw s. 149 - Prosecution for murder and for causing injuries - In the c incident, injuries sustained by the prosecution-witnesses as well as accused persons - Contradiction in the police statement of complainant and FIR version, regarding number of accused participating in the incident - One of the accused, in his statement uls. 313 stated that complainant party was 0 the aggressor - I. 0. not recording the statement of the injured accused - Conviction by trial court - Acquittal by High Court - On appeal, held: In view of. the testimony of PWs,
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Basappa v. State of Karnataka
- 2014 Shyamal Saha & Anr. v. State of West Bengal
- 2015 Jodhan v. State of M.P.
- 2014 Vijay Pal Singh and Others v. State of Utiarakhand
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.