Supreme Court of India
Pyare Mohan Lal v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order.
Judgment, page 24
From the headnote
Service law: Compulsory retirement - Judicial review - Scope of Compulsory retirement - Adverse entries in the ACRs - Significance of, while retiring a person compulsorily - Held: The adverse entries remain part of the record for overall consideration to retire a government servant compulsorily - The object always is public interest - Such entries do not lose significance, even if the employee has subsequently been promoted - The law requires the Authority to consider .the "entire service record" of the employee before assessing him for compulsory retirement irrespective of the fact that the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Nisha Priya Bhatia v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2020 Arun Kumar Gupta v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- 2019 Ram Murti Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- 2015 Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.and Ors. v. Hari Klshan Verma
- 2012 Vijay Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2025 Raju Naryana Swamy v. State of Kerala & Ors.
Of those, 5 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.