Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka & Ors. v. Ganpathi Chaya Naik & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the claims of the respondents for regularization or absorption cannot be sustained.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Service law - Regularization/absorption - Daily wagers in continuous service for more than ten years since the date of their appointment - Regularization of service - Claim of - Held: Not sustainable since daily wagers were not recruited as per the Recruitment Rules - Order of tribunal as upheld by High Cowt directing the employer to consider in the cases of daily wagers for regularization, set aside. -0 Plea - New plea - Raising of - Before Supreme Court - Permissibility of - Held: Not permissible. Respondent-daily wagers claimed regularization of service on the ground that they had been in
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.