Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Ayub Dar v. State of J & K
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, it is clear that the appellant herein on one hand has chosen to rely upon a part of the confession and on the other hand, he asserts that he had, at no point of time, made any confessional statement.
Judgment, page 35
From the headnote
Ranbir Penal Code, Samvat 1989 (AD 1932) - ss. 302 and 1208 r/w s. 3(3) of TADA Act - Conviction under - By designated court - On appeal, held: Conviction is justified - Prosecution was able to prove the homicidal death - The confession made by the accused was voluntary and truthful and hence reliable - The confessional statement was also corroborated by oral and documentary evidence - Once confession made uls. 15 of TADA Act is accepted, no other evidence is required - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - ss. 3(3) and 15. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Sanjay Dutt (a-117) v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi (stf), Bombay
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.