Supreme Court of India
Vikram Vir Vohra v. Shalini Bhalla
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - s. 26 - Custody of minor child - Divorce by mutual consent - Settlement between parlies as regards custody of minor child - Visitation rights granted to father - Application u/s. 26 seeking modification of terms and custody of minor - Courls below allowing wife to take child to Australia where she was employed for gain with a direction to bring child back to India twice in year for allowing visitation rights of father - Interference with - Held: Not called for - Welfare of child is of paramount imporlance in matters of custody - Custody orders are interlocutory
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Neethu B. @ Neethu Baby Mathew v. Rajesh Kumar
- 2017 Santhini v. Vijaya Venketesh
- 2010 Dr. Ashish Ranjan v. Dr. Anupama Tandon and Anr.
Of those, 1 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.