Supreme Court of India
Jai Kumar v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the prosecution has been able to establish the guilt of the D appellant beyond all reasonable doubt for conviction under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC for having robbed money and tractor.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
PENAL CODE, 1860: s. 302 - Accused throwing the victim, who was in an inebriated condition, into canal - Victim trying to come out, but accused kicked him and again threw him into canal - Death of victim - HELD: Accused was rightly convicted uls 302 - His case was not identical to the act of other accused who was convicted uls 304 (part - II). o The appellant and three others were convicted and sentenced by the trial Court ulss. 392, 397 and 302134 IPC. The appeals filed by the accused were dismissed by the High Court. One of the accused, namely, 'S' filed appeal before the Supreme Court
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.