Supreme Court of India
Ram Parshotam Mittal & Anr. v. M/s Hillcrest Realty Sdn.bhd. & Ors. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
COMPANIES ACT, 1956: Sections 3, 87(2)(b), 90(2) - Interpretation and c applicability of - Held: The very fact that Form 23 was filed along with the necessary resolutions and a statement in lieu of prospectus was filed is sufficient for arriving at a prima facie conclusion that the company ha.s altered its status and had become a public company - Also having regard to the definition in Section 3(1 )(iii) as soon as its number of members exceeds 50, the company loses its character as a private company - The observations made in this case are of prima facie nature only for disposal of the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- 2019 Ram Parshotam Mittal & Ors. v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.