Supreme Court of India
Food Corp. of India & Ors. v. Ashis Kumar Ganguly & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the authorities in the cases of Jasmer Singh, Tilak Raj, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology and Tarun K. Roy lay down the correct law.
Judgment, page 19
From the headnote
Service Law: c Food Corporations Act, 1964 - Sections 12, 12AI Regulation 81 - Grant of advance increments to deputationist employees - Directed by the High Court - Correctness of - Held, Correct - The High Court has rightly found that in the matter of grant of benefits under proviso appended to 0 Regulation 81, all employees were similarly situated - Constitution of India, Articles 14, 39A. Food Corporation of India & Ors. v. . .I. Deputationists Assocn. & Ors. SLP ( ) No. 16416of1996 decided by S. . on 29.8.1996; State of Tamil Nadu v. Seshachalam (2007) 10 SCC 137; The State of Madhya
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 distinguished
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.