Supreme Court of India
Anirudh Aggarwal v. Dharam Bir Bhatia
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that, prima facie, the National E Commission was not justified in dismissing the revision petition filed by the appellant.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - s. 12 - Medical negligence - Payment of compensation - Respondent filed claim petition alleging that appellant left treatment of his daughter's teeth midway - District Forum directed appellant to pay compensation of Rs.25,0001-and cost of Rs.3,0001-to respondent - State Commission held that no medical negligence was involved but directed that respondent be paid Rs.14,0001- i.e. the amount purportedly paid by him for treatment - Both respondent and appellant filed revision petition before National Commission - National Commission dismissed revision petition
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.