Supreme Court of India
Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985: Classification - Dant Manjan Lal - Held: Is tooth powder c and specifically covered by Chapter SH 3306 and not under Chapter SH 3003.31 as medicament- It is used routinely for dental hygiene - By virtue of note 1(d) of Chapter 30, even if the product has some therapeutic _or medicinal prop~rties, it stands excluded from Chapter 30 - Common parlance test 0 continues to be determinative test for classification of product either medicament or cosmetic - Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - s.3(a) - Interpretative Rules - Rule 3(a). Change in classification - Criteria
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. M/s. Connaught Plaza Restaurant (p) Ltd., New Delhi
- 2023 Commisssioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad v. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.