Supreme Court of India
Mohammad Raofuddin v. The Land Acquisition Officer
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: c ss.15, 23, 24 - Award of compensation by High Court- Scope of interference by Supreme Court - Held: Is very limited - Interference is warranted only if it is found that courts below applied wrong principles or omitted to take relevant factors affecting valuation - On facts, there is no ground to ..... interfere with the award of High Court as it took into .. consideration an instance which was more closer to appellant's land in respect of the date of acquisition was in the same village and was acquired for the same purpose. Lands measuring 4 acres 2 guntas
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 U.P. Awas Evam Vikash Parishad v. Asha Ram (d) Thr. Lrs & Ors.
- 2010 Iyasamy & Anr. v. Special Tahsildar, Lano Acquisition
- 2010 Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Karigowda & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.