Supreme Court of India
Rumi Dhar v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.239 - Discharge - Accused persons charged for defrauding the bank, falsification of account and forgery of records - Charges also c framed - Meanwhile some settlement arrived at in the debt recovery suit before Tribunal - Payment made by accused in terms of settlement-Application for discharge by accused :>- -Held: Trial Court rightly dismissed application for discharge - Settlement with the creditor would not exonerate the accused from prima facie charge in a criminal case - While considering application for discharge uls. 239, it is for trial court to go
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 2011 Sushil Suri v. C.b.i & Anr.
- 2015 Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh
- 2014 State of Maharashtra through Cbi v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi and Others
- 2012 Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Another
- 2012 Ashok Sadarangani & Anr. v. Union of !noia & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.