Supreme Court of India
Leila David v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 : s. 14 - Contempt in the face of Supreme Court - During the hearing of a case four litigants committed contempt in the face of the Court - Held : Per Pasayat. J - Conduct of the contemnors is contemptuous - There is no need to issue notice, as contemnors stated in open Court that they stood by what they had said and done in Court - Registrar would take the contemnors into custody - The contemnors shall suffer three months' simple imprisonment - Per Ganquly, J- This is prima facie an incident when provision of s. 14 of the Act can be invoked - The four steps
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.