Supreme Court of India
Uma Nath Pandey and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Natural justice - Rule of audi alteram partem - High c Court allowed criminal revision petition filed by respondent no. 2 without issuing notice to appellants and to other parties - Appeal against- Held: Order passed by High Court was wholly vitiated - It is but essential that a party should be put on notice of the case before any adverse order is passed against him - There was violation of the principles of natural justice - Matter remitted to High Court for consideration afresh after issuance > of notice to the concerned respondents before it - Notice. • The High Court, by the impugned
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Krishnadatt Awasthy v. State of M.P. & Ors.
- 2023 Trust Estate Khimji Keshawji & Anr v. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
- 2023 Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. & Anr.
- 2023 State Bank of India & Ors v. Rajesh Agarwal & Ors
- 2013 Union of India and Others v. Sanjay Jethi and Another
Of those, 5 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.