Supreme Court of India

Mahesh Datiatray Thirthkar v. State of Maharashtra

Neutral citation
Reported as [2009] 3 S.C.R. 1122
Bench Tarun Chatterjee and V.S. Sirpurkar JJ.
Decided 4 March 2009

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that this Court would not be permitted to interfere with D the findings of fact arrived at by the High Court orr·consideration of the materials on record, oral and documentary, in that case, the question of going into the other aspects of the matter, which was argued by the learned counsel for the parties, would not arise at all.

Judgment, page 14

From the headnote

Constitution of India, 1950: c Arlicle 136 - Exercise of power under- Scope of - Held: Power thereunder is exercisable not only against judgment of reversal on facts but also in cases of concurrent findings off act - Supreme Courl would ordinarily not interfere with the findings of fact arrived at by High Courl unless conclusions of High Courl are manifestly perverse or unsupporlable from evidence on record - On facts, findings made by High Courl were arbitrary causing serious miscarriage of justice as against the claimant by denying him a just and reasonable compensation for properly

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.