Supreme Court of India
Grand Kakatiya Sheraton Hotel & Towers Employees & Workers Union v. Srinivasa Resorts Ltd. & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we concur with the judgment of the High Court and confirm the same.
Judgment, page 38
From the headnote
c Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - s. 47 (3) and (4) - Constitutional validity of - Held: The provisions are unconstitutional, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution - On lifting the veil from s. 47 (3), it is clear that the 'service compensation' is in fact 'gratuity' - The Act being a State Act is in conflict .. with the Central Act i.e. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 as both, operate in the common field - The Act cannot be saved by virtue of Article 254(2) unless shown that while obtaining Presidential asset for the State Act,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. v. K. Shyam Sunder & Ors.
- 2012 Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsinghpur v. M/s. Shiv Shakti Khansari Udyog and Others
- 2011 Ap. Dairy Development Corporation Federation v. B. Narasimha Reddy & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.