Supreme Court of India
Kaliaperumal v. Rajagopal & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons the appeal fails and is dismissed.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 : ss.54 and 55(4)(b) - Sale - Intention of the parties - t c Determination of - Registration of deed - Effect of - Held: Though registration is prima facie proof of an intention to transfer the property, it is not proof of operative transfer if payment of consideration (price) is condition precedent for passing of the property - On facts, the parties intended that ownership of property would be transferred to appellant only after receipt of entire consideration by respondent-vendors, as condition precedent - The title was intended to pass only on payment of
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Indian Overseas Bank v. M/s Rcm Infrastructure Ltd. and Another
- 2011 Janak Dulari Devi & Anr. v. Kapildeo Rai & Anr.
- 2019 Thulasidhara & Another v. Narayanappa & Others
- 2015 Rajinder Kumar v. State of Haryana
- 2014 Davinder Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2014 Manohar Lal v. State of Haryana
Of those, 2 referred to · 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.