Supreme Court of India
Ajmer Singh v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid findings, we do not find any G infirmity in the impugned order of the High Court.
Judgment, page 20
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: s.20 - Prosecution under - Conviction by courts below c - On appeal, conviction upheld. s. 50 - Applicability of - In case of search and recovery from bag, briefcase, container etc. - Held: Such case does not come within ambit of s. 50 - The provision is applicable 0 only in a case of search of person. Evidence - Official witness - Not corroborated by independent witness - In a case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Authenticity of - Held: Normally in a charge under the Act, corroboration from independent witness is
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 G H State of Punjab v. Baljinder Singh & Anr.
- 2013 Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana
- 2022 Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
- 2013 Ram Swaroop v. State (govt. Nct) of Delhi
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.