Supreme Court of India
Parminder Kaur v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above we are of the clear opinion that this prosecution is nothing but an abuse of the process of law and we, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the impugned C judgment and quash the Prosecution Case No.3045 of 2004 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur.
Judgment, page 20
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 - FIR lodged r- .... u/ss.420146714681471 /PC against sister in law - Allegation c that she committed forgery by filing false affidavit wherein dates were altered - Petition uls. 482 before High Court, dismissed - On appeal, held: Manner in which litigation was fought shows that the criminal prosecution was started to wreak vengeance - Trial court took cognizance of non existent offence mechanically - Complainant was not able to show • that appellant could be benefitted in any manner by changing the dates - Change could not and did not result in any
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.