Supreme Court of India
Ramesh Chandra Agrawal v. Regency Hospital Ltd. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above discussion, appeal raquires to be allowed and, accordingly, it is allowed.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Medical negligence - Appellant diagnosed with T. . infection - Operated upon - ).. c Multiple operations - Operations unsuccessful - Appellant filed complaint before National Commission; sought compensation - Complaint dismissed - On appeal, held: Appellant had filed all records of treatment before the Commission - Registry of the Commission, due to oversight, did not send original records and X-Ray films to the expert '/I neurologist who had been requested to offer his opinion on >- the surgery done on appellant- Due to non-availability of vital aryd important
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Pattu Rajan v. The State of Tamil Nadu
- 2017 State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors.
- 2019 Maharaja Agrasen Hospital & Ors. v. Master Rishabh Sharma & Ors.
- 2016 Prem Sagar Manocha v. State (nct of Delhi)
- 2013 Safi Mohd. v. State of Rajasthan
- 2022 Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.