Supreme Court of India
Anil Kumar Jain v. Maya Jain
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that this is a fit case where we may exercise the powers vested in us under Article 142 of the Constitution.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955: c s. 13-8 - Petition for divorce by mutual consent - Couple living separately for seven years - Under a settlement, husband transfening valuable properly rights in favour of wife and the wife enjoying the properly - After registration of transfer in favour of wife, she withdrew her consent and still 0 insisted on living separately - Held: Consent given by parties for mutual divorce uls. 13-8 has to subsist till a decree is passed and in the event either of the parties withdraws the consent before passing of the final decree, petition uls 13-8 would not survive and
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Soni Kumari v. Deepak Kumar
- 2024 Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda
- 2017 Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur
- 2011 Ab. Bhaskara Rao v. Inspector of Police, Cbi Visakhapatnam
- 2010 Neeti Malviya v. Rakesh Malviya
Of those, 1 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.