Supreme Court of India
Ashok K. Jha & Ors. v. Garden Silk Mills & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that Letters Patent Appeal was maintainable from the order dated October 1, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge. c We answer question (2) in affirmative.
Judgment, page 27
From the headnote
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946: s.42(1 ), Schedule II, Item 1 and 2, Schedule Ill, Item 2 - Notice of c change - Transfer of workers within establishment - From Crimping Department to Twisting Department - Held: Would not attract Item Nos. 1 and 2 of Schedule II but would be covered by Item 2 of Schedule Ill for which no notice under s.42(1) was necessary - Orders of transfer clearly stated that +-- there was no change in service conditions of workers and the type of work also remained the same - Burden to establish that number of workers in the two departments was determined f and
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- 2015 Sh Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- 2021 Caparo Engineering India Ltd. v. Ummed Singh Lodhi and Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.