Supreme Court of India
Mohabbat and Ors. v. State of M.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid, it cannot be said that the F prosecution has established the accusations so far as accused Iqbal and lsrail i.e. accused Nos. 7 and 6 are concerned.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 rlw & 149, 147 and 148 - conviction of nine accused - By courts below - On the basis c of evidence of sole eye-witness - Appeal to this court by three accused - Held: On facts, prosecution failed to establish the accusations against two of the appellant-accused - Hence, acquitted - Accusation against one of the appellant-accused established. o Witness - Related witness - Reliance on - Held: Relationship is not a factor to affect credibility of a witness - But in case of plea of false implication, court to adopt careful approach in analysis thereof. Appellants-accused
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.