Supreme Court of India
Sannaia Subba Rao & Ors. v. State of A.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant No. 3 is guilty of the offence under Section 363 IPC and accordingly we· C proceed to convict him accordingly.
Judgment, page 27
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860; Ss. 363, 366A, 368 and 372 rlw s.511: Kidnapping of a girl by accused allegedly with intention to commit sexual intercourse/selling her for prostitution - Held: Evidence given by prosecutrix in trial different from the one set out in the complaint - There were contradictions in her statements - In her deposition, the prosecutrix gave embel lished and more aggravated form of deposition by alleging commission of major offences of sexual abuse against ac cused persons and selling her for prostitution but in support thereof no evidence adduced - No case under Ss. 366A or 372
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.