Supreme Court of India
Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Ved Prakash Aggarwal
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the MRTP Commission was clearly in error in directing the GOA to handover possession to the re- c spondent.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - s.36 - Unfair trade practice - Complainant's case that land c allotted to trim by Ghaziabad Development Authority under the Scheme and after many years cancelled arbitrarily_- Com- plaint alleging unfair trade practice against GOA - Allowed by MRTP Commission and GOA directed to allot alternate plot to complainant at the price fixed - Held: Complainant was successful in draw of lots, thus, act of GOA amounted to unfair trade practice - However, MRTP Commission has no Juris- diction to direct GOA to hand over possession of vacant plot to
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.