Supreme Court of India
Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Director General (i & R) & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the charge as levelled does not fall under clause (f) of Section 33( 1) of the Act.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - s.33(1)(g) - Notice of enquiry issued alleging involvement of appellant in restrictive trade practice within the meaning of s. 33 - Commission held that alleged trade practice was covered under s.33(1)(g) of the Act and as such prejudicial to public interest and directed appellant to cease such practice - On appeal, Held: Neither notice nor application allege that the appellant ever indulged in or that alleged trade practice has or may have the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition in any manner - Therefore, neither
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.