Supreme Court of India
Union of India and Ors. v. Bipad Bhanjan Gayen
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that it was a deliberate attempt on the part of the re spondent to withhold relevant information and it is this omission which has led to the termination of his service during the proba tion period.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Service Law: Termination - For withholding information in attestation form - Selection as constable pending verification - Candi- date required to disclose in verification if he had been involved in criminal case - Candidate still under probation - Non-dis closure of criminal cases pending against him - Termination when found that he w~s involved in criminal cases - Correct ness of - Held: He was rightly terminated as he withheld rel- evant information - In such situation, question of any stigma or reading of principles of natural justice would not arise - Mere fact that he was discharged
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India & Ors
- 2012 Jainendra Singh v. State of U.P. Tr. Prinl. Sec. Home & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.