Supreme Court of India
P. Venugopal v. Union of India
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the proviso is ultra vires G and unconstitutional and accordingly it is struck down.
Judgment, page 33
From the headnote
I India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Proviso to sub-section (1A) of Section 11 - Constitutional validity of - Held, ultra vires unconstitutional, c violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and void ab initio - Hence struck down - Constitution of India, Article 14- Service law - Administrative law, principles of Natural Justice. Words & Phrases: "Tenure" - Meaning of In the writ petition filed before this Court, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to sub-section (1A) of Section 11 of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Joseph Shine v. Union of India
- 2011 J.S. Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- 2024 Khalsa University and Another v. The State of Punjab and Another
- 2021 Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Anr.
- 2015 Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal Etc. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.