Supreme Court of India
Madhuban v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above facts and circumstances, in our opinion, ends of justice would be met if we allow this appeal, set aside the order passed by the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal in accordance with G law.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860; Ss.302, 323, 394 rlw s.34 /PC: Murder - Trial Court found accused guilty of committing c murder of father and son and convicted him u/ss 302, 323, 394 rlw s.34 /PC and sentenced them accordingly-Affirmed by High Court allegedly without hearing counsel of appellant - Correctness of - Held: Counsel for appellant sought for extension of time before the High Court for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the affidavit - Advocate for the appellant could not make oral submission before the High Court because of infection in vocal cord - Under the circumstances, it would
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.