Supreme Court of India
Bathula Nagamalleswara Rao & Ors. v. State Rep. by Public Prosecutor
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In the result, there is no merit in this appeal and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Judgment, page 28
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 r. w. s. 149 ands. 429- Conviction under, based on evidence of eye witnesses - High Court disbelieved testimony of PW-3 in regard to presence of -4 to c -9 at scene of occurrence and their participation in commission of crime and granted benefit of doubt- Conviction of appellants ( -1, -2, -10 to -12), however upheld relying upon same set of evidence of PW-3 - Challenged on the ground that PW-3 was interested witness and thus framed appellants in false case - Held: Presence of PW-3 on scene J; of occurrence fully established by evidence of PW-1 and PW- 2 and his name
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.