Supreme Court of India
M/s Parakh Foods Ltd. v. State of A.P. & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal is allowed and the impugned finding of the High Court as regards misbranding and violation of Rule 370 of the PFA Rules is set aside.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 37 - Labeling of edible oils and fats - Case of misbranding against manufacturer and seller of 'refined soyabean oil' - c Based on report of public analyst that pictures of vegetables on label of 'refined soyabean oil' exaggeration of quality of product - Held: Case of misbranding and violation of Rule 37 not made out - Pictures of vegetables on label was to depict that article of food could be used for cooking the vegetables shown in the picture' - Vegetables shown does not indicate ' ' the quality of soyabean oil nor exaggeration towards
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.