Supreme Court of India
Manipal Academy of Higher Education v. Provident Fund Commissioner
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
LabowLaw: Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous c Provisions Act, 1952: s.2(b) - 'Basic. Wage' - 'Leave encashment' - HELD: Amount received by encashing earned leave is not a part of "basic wage" under s.2(b) requiring pro rata contribution by 0 employer. In the instant appeals filed by the employer, the question for consideration before the Court was: whether the amount received by encashing the earned' leave is a part of "basic wage" under Section 2(b) of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requiring pro rata employer's contribution? Allowing the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Kichha Sugar Company Limited Th. Gen. Mang. v. Tarai Chini Mill Majdoor Union, Uttarkhand
- 2019 Mishra and Navin Sinha, Jj.] v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir and Others
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.