Supreme Court of India
Umesh Challiyil v. K.P. Rajendran
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Representation of the People Act, 1961: s.83 - Election petition on the ground of corrupt practices - Rejection of, on account of defects in verification of election petition and in c affirmation of affidavit- High Court dismissed election petition under s. 86 - Correctness of - Held: Not correct - The defects were of very minor nature - It is true that verification was not in same words as was required in form No. 7 under Rule 82 of the Conduct of Election Rules of High Court of Kera/a, 1971 framed in exercise of power under Article 225 of the Constitution of India - However, it can not be
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 G.M. Siddeshwar v. Prasanna Kumar
- 2012 Ponnala Lakshmalah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Ors.
- 2014 C. P. John v. Babu M. Palissery & Ors.
- 2010 K.K. Ramachandran Master v. M.V. Sreyamakumar & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.