Supreme Court of India
Avinash Kumar Chauhan v. Vijay Krishna Mishra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Stamp Act, 1899 - ss. 33 and 35 and Article 23 of Schedule 1A (as substituted by M.P. Act No. 19 of 1989) -- Execution of sale deed - Execution whereof statutorily barred - Suit by the vendee for recovery of consideration amount - Reliance on the conveyance deed which was not registered - Document impounded, being not duly stamped - Held: Provision of ss. 33 and 35 are applicable, even if the : unregistered document sought to be admitted in evidence is for collateral purpose - The purpose for which reliance is placed on the document is not relevant for applicability of the provisions - s. 35
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Omprakash v. Laxminarayan & Ors.
- 2018 Ameer Minhaj v. Dierdre Elizabeth (wright) Issar and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.