Supreme Court of India
U.R. Virupakshaiah v. Sarvamma & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908: s. 100 - Second appeal - High Court formulating c additional substantial question of law while dictating judgment in open court - Propriety of - Held: Before such a substantial question of law could be formulated, parties should have been put to notice and given an opportunity (o meet the same - High Court did not at all deal with the substantial questions of law formulated at the time of admission of the second appeal - Judgment of High Court set aside and matter remitted to it for consideration afresh - Hindu Law - Existence of joint family - Presumption. In
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2009 Koppisetty Venkat Ratnam (d) through Lrs. v. Pamarti Venkayamma
- 2009 Narayanan Rajendran & Another v. Lekshmy Sarojini & Others
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.