Supreme Court of India
P.H. Dayanand v. S. Venugopal Naidu & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Suit for possession - Based on title - Decreed - Courts below arrived at finding of fact that plaintiff purchased suit property from rightful owner and defendant no.2 did not acquire any title over property - Interference with - Held: Not called for as defendant no. 2 merely came in permissive possession and could not be said to have acquired better title than the plaintiff. The case of plaintiff-respondent no.1 was that he purchased the suit property from the lawful owner. Defendant no.2-appellant claimed that he was in lawful possession of property in his own right. Plaintiff filed a suit
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.