Supreme Court of India
Ramachami v. State Rep. by State Prosecutor
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the appropriate conviction under Section 304 Part 11 IPC and custodial sentence of 8 years would meet the ends of justice.
Judgment, page 4
From the headnote
c Penal Code, 1860: ss. 304 (part II) and 392 - Conviction of accused ulss 302 and 392 on the basis of circumstantial evidence - Upheld by High Court - HELD: The circumstances established are sufficient to hold the accused guilty - However, considering the nature of injuries, accused convicted u/s 304(par:t II) - f Custodial sentence of 8 years would meet-the ends of justice - Conviction and sentence uls 392 need no interf.erence - Both the sentences to run concurrently - Circumstantial evidence. Appellant-accused was convicted ulss 302 and 392 IPC by the trial court on the basis of the
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.